Top 75 UK employers for social mobility revealed
23 employers enter the top list for the first time – including MI6
85% feel their clients care about the social class mix of their workforce
Majority of employers of 1.1 million people now ask new staff questions about their social class
The Top 75 UK employers in 2019 who have taken the most action on social mobility in the workplace are announced today. They include banks, engineering firms, law firms, government departments, retailers – and MI6, the first time one of Britain’s intelligence agencies has entered the list.
The Index is the creation of the Social Mobility Foundation and ranks the UK’s employers on the actions they are taking to ensure they are open to accessing and progressing talent from all backgrounds. It highlights the employers doing the most to change the way they find, recruit and progress talented employees from different social class backgrounds.
Employers who employ over 1.1 million people in the UK across 18 different sectors took part in this year’s Index, answering around 100 questions across 7 key areas.
The full 75 are listed below. The highest ranked employer by key areas include:
Overall – PwC |
IT & Telecomms – Capgemini |
Banking – J.P. Morgan |
Media – BBC |
Engineering – Arup |
Property/real estate – JLL |
Government dept – Ministry of Justice |
Publishing – Penguin Random House |
Insurance – Aviva |
Retail – Enterprise Rent-A-Car |
Law – Baker McKenzie |
Utilities – Severn Trent |
Findings from the Index include:
- 85% of respondents to a question about client priorities said they feel their clients want them to be diverse in terms of socio-economic background, very close to those saying race (96%) and gender (99%)*
- A majority of employers ask their new employees whether or not their parents went to university (51%) or the type of school they attended (53%).
- Nearly 40% ask whether or not you were eligible for Free School Meals, whilst almost 20% ask the postcode you grew up in and 17% the occupation of your parents.
- Over 30% of employers now remove the name, university and/or school grades of candidates when reviewing applications
Research has consistently shown that people from more affluent backgrounds take a disproportionate number of the best jobs and that employers tend to disproportionately employ graduates who went to private schools and a small number of universities.
The Social Mobility Employer Index is a voluntary and free of charge survey that assesses employers on how much they are trying to change this across seven areas.
This year’s Index shows the growth of employers who care about being diverse in terms of social class as well as being diverse in other areas such as gender and race/ethnicity. It finds a wide-ranging set of changes are taking place in how employers work with young people, design their recruitment/selection processes, the data they collect and their strategies for retaining employees from different backgrounds.
Other key findings include:
- 42% of employers monitor their recruitment process to see where those from lower socio-economic backgrounds fall down
- Nearly 40% of employers have assessed whether their organisation’s culture is welcoming to those from lower socio-economic backgrounds
- 1 in 4 put the grades of the candidates applying to them in the context of the academic performance of the school or college the applicant attended
- 28% have social mobility targets
But there is still more progress required:
- Oxford and Cambridge are still visited by Index entrants more than 72 universities combined (although this has fallen from 2017 when they were visited more than 110 universities combined).
- Whilst 45% of applications to all Index employers come from the 24 Russell Group universities, 62% of hires do; at law firms, 84% of hires do. These figures are largely unchanged in 3 years despite employers making fewer visits to Russell Group universities overall
- Only 22% of 2019 entrants publish their socio-economic background data compared to 27% in 2018
- Over 80% of employers do not monitor progression within their organisation by socio-economic background
- Only 36% encourage firms in their supply chains to take action on social mobility
David Johnston OBE, Chief Executive of the Social Mobility Foundation, said:
“We are delighted to see more and more employers every year taking part in our Social Mobility Employer Index. The quality of submissions this year meant we have increased the size of our Top list from 50 to 75 and it shows the very wide range of organisations trying to make progress on social mobility. Whilst no employer would say they have cracked their social mobility challenge, all of the employers in the Top list – along with those that didn’t quite make it – should be congratulated for the efforts they’re making to ensure their organisation is open to talent from all class backgrounds.”
The Rt Hon Alan Milburn, Chair of the Social Mobility Foundation, said:
“Social mobility is becoming a cause for more and more of our country’s top employers. When politics is weak, society needs to be strong – so it is welcome a growing number of employers are stepping up to the plate. They recognise the need to open their doors to a wider pool of talent both to address growing public concerns about unfairness and to reap the business benefits from having more diverse workforces. The onus is now on all of our country’s top employers to do the same.”
The Top 75 Social Mobility Employer Index 2019 rankings
1 |
PwC |
2 |
KPMG UK LLP |
3 |
Severn Trent |
4 |
JLL |
5 |
Baker McKenzie |
6 |
Deloitte |
7 |
Ministry of Justice |
8 |
Grant Thornton |
9 |
Linklaters LLP |
10 |
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner |
11 |
Enterprise Rent-A-Car |
12 |
Civil Service Fast Stream and Early Talent |
13 |
Aviva PLC |
14 |
Mazars |
15 |
Capgemini UK |
16 |
DWF |
17 |
J. P. Morgan |
18 |
DLA Piper |
19 |
Herbert Smith Freehills |
20 |
Santander UK |
21 |
Standard Life Aberdeen |
22 |
Department for Education |
23 |
Financial Conduct Authority |
24 |
Fujitsu |
25 |
Penguin Random House UK |
26 |
The Honourable Society of the Inner Temple |
27 |
Freeths LLP |
28 |
Brodies LLP |
29 |
Department for Work & Pensions |
30 |
Wm Morrison Supermarkets PLC |
31 |
FDM Group |
32 |
Allen & Overy |
33 |
CMS |
34 |
Accenture |
35 |
Ministry of Defence |
36 |
Mears Group plc |
37 |
Clifford Chance LLP |
38 |
BBC |
39 |
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
40 |
Slaughter and May |
41 |
British Land |
42 |
Department for International Trade |
43 |
HM Treasury |
44 |
O2 |
45 |
The Co-op |
46 |
Teach First |
47 |
RPC |
48 |
Shoosmiths LLP |
49 |
Eversheds Sutherland LLP |
50 |
HM Revenue & Customs |
51 |
Mayer Brown |
52 |
Pinsent Masons LLP |
53 |
ARUP |
54 |
The Home Office |
55 |
British Army |
56 |
City of London Corporation |
57 |
Dentons |
58 |
MediaComUK |
59 |
HFW |
60 |
Hogan Lovells International LLP |
61 |
Cabinet Office |
62 |
Crown Prosecution Service |
63 |
Burges Salmon LLP |
64 |
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP |
65 |
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust |
66 |
Barts Health NHS Trust |
67 |
Legal & General |
68 |
M&GPrudential |
69 |
Simmons & Simmons |
70 |
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy |
71 |
HarperCollins Publishers UK |
72 |
Transport for London |
73 |
Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) |
74 |
Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport |
75 |
Barclays |
*Some entrants did not answer the question about client priorities. If they are included in the overall figures, 63% of all Index organisations said socio-economic background compared to 71% saying race and 74% saying gender
Responses